Cases 1 - 10 of 896
Busby v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conrady v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03078
Petitioner:
Wyatt A. Conrady
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Latham v. Officer Wyatt et al
as 1:2024cv11310
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Wyatt and Inmate Canteen Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Busby v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Wyatt Busby
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Decker
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Octavia Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wyatt v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 4:2024cv02305
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin Wyatt
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gotschall v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Robert Gotschall
Defendant:
State of Montana, B.O.P.P., PSI Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Biden, O L Luther and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LANE et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT LANE, HARRIS, T WYATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
