Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
WEEKLEY v. SGT. PROVIDENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff: MONROE WEEKLEY, III
Defendant: SGT. PROVIDENT, OFFICER COLE, OFFICER DRAYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WEEKLEY v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00660
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner: MONROE WEEKLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Weekley
as 5:2020cv05169
Defendant: Warden Weekley
Plaintiff: Torey D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Weekley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01104
Plaintiff: Torey Phillips and Torey D Phillips
Defendant: Weekley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weekley v. USA
as 4:2020cv00631
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Natasa Weekley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ECKERT v. MENTCH et al
as 2:2019cv00600
Plaintiff: BARRY L. ECKERT
Defendant: MR. WEEKLEY, J. A. MENTCH and L. R. WEEKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Weekley v. U.S. Penitentiary-Coleman
as 6:2018cv01022
Plaintiff: Boyd D. Weekley
Defendant: U.S. Penitentiary-Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE-JONES v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff: AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT LANEL CAPOZZI, DEPUTY NICKELSON, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Weekley v. Howard Pohl, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-11593
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY ALAN WEEKLEY
Defendant - Appellee: HOWARD A. POHL, ROBERT D. HERTZBERG and KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE
Weekly v. Pohl et al
as 1:2017cv22503
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Alan Weekley
Defendant: Howard A. Pohl, Robert D. Hertzberg and Katherine Fernandez Rundle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?