Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robinson v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2022cv01804
Petitioner:
Michael Wesley Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Jauregui et al
as 2:2022cv01705
Plaintiff:
Michael Wesley Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Jauregui, Unknown Burjorquez, Unknown Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nabaya v. Dinkin et al
as 3:2019cv00171
Defendant:
H. Wesley Robinson, Alex F. Kochanowski and William J. Dinkin
Plaintiff:
Shapat Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. National Legal Professional Associates et al
as 3:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Darren Wilson
Defendant:
National Legal Professional Associates, H. Wesley Robinson, Glenda Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Dorrah
as 5:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robinson, III
Defendant:
Katherine Dorrah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ali et al v. Robinson et al
as 2:2013cv01353
Plaintiff:
Ouati K Ali and Cindy L Ali Kowalke
Defendant:
Hugh Wesley Robinson, Susan Trott, Stephanie Shortt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas et al v. Ratliff et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Lamont O. Douglas, Charmaine Douglas and Carlos Davis
Defendant:
Robert A. Ratliff, H. Wesley Robinson, Mark Konerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osbourne v. Ratliff et al
as 1:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Derwin Osbourne
Defendant:
Robert Ratliff, Matthew M. Robinson, H. Wesley Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Robinson et al
as 1:2008cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Brown
Defendant:
H. Wesley Robinson, Mark Konerman, Matthew M. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roy Thomas v. National Legal Professional As, et al
as 08-7084
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Roy Thomas
Defendant - Appellant:
National Legal Professional Associates, H. Wesley Robinson and Charles Alex Murray
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
