Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Wolf Guts v. County et al
as 5:2024cv05015
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant:
Mr. M County, Mr. H Shied, FBCP Phd's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Shies v. Partlow
as 24-60089
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lee Shies
Defendant:
Ronnie Partlow, Jail Administrator, Captain and Jailor Smothers
Richard Wolf Guts v. Couwty, et al
as 23-2519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant / Appellee:
Couwty, Case Manager at USP Tucson, AZ; individual and official capacity, Shied, Lieutenant at USP Tucson, AZ; individual and official capacity, Attorney General, Springfield, MO at Federal District Court and others
Wolf Guts v. Couwty et al
as 5:2022cv05088
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant:
Couwty, Shied, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Cavazos v. Trejo, et al
as 22-55792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant / Appellee:
TREJO, GARILASO, Mr.; First name unknown, ROGERS, Mr.; First name unknown and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Webster v. Shi et al
as 4:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Zheng-Li Shi, Serum Institute, CoviShield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Stuckey et al v. People Republic of China et al
as 4:2020cv07344
Defendant:
National Health Commission of the People Republic of China, Shi Zhengli, People Liberation Army and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Kenneth Stuckey, Anthony Grisby, M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
