Cases 1 - 10 of 66
McDonald v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv03211
Petitioner:
Collin J. McDonald
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham #193576 v. Ledford et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Steve Graham #193576
Defendant:
P. Ledford and J. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. McDonald et al
as 3:2021cv01563
Plaintiff:
Richard Rice
Defendant:
Micheal J. McDonald, Sarah H Trickett and Elizabeth M Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans #367619 v. Horton et al
as 2:2020cv00134
Defendant:
Unknown Bigger, Unknown Trestrail, Unknown Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Rice et al
as 2:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Thomas O Rice and Allan J McDonald
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Corcella et al
as 3:2019cv01889
Defendant:
Carla Ocampo, Kara Phillips, Anthony Corcella and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. City of Middletown et al
as 7:2019cv08255
Defendant:
Orange County, P.O. Trapani, P.O. Nicholas Pesola and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2019cv00312
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kyle J. McDonald
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richmond v. McDonald
as 1:2018cv23843
Defendant:
Sergeant J. McDonald
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Richmond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Mullicane v. Glendora Police Department, et al
as 17-56627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEWART MULLICANE
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENDORA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL HENDERSON, GPD Detective; in individual and in official capacity, TIMOTHY STAAB, GPD Chief ; in individual and in official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
