Cases 101 - 110 of 202
United States of America v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv06326
Defendant:
Prevezon Holdings Ltd., Prevezon 1810, L.L.C., ANY AND ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER **********6021 HELD IN THE NAME OF PREVEZON SEVEN USA LLC and others
Petitioner:
Victoria Tarantino Consulting LLC, Hermitage Capital Management Ltd., Sundance Aspen, LLC and others
Claimant:
Martash Holdings, IKR and Denis Katsyv
Interested Party:
HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) S.A., Baker & Hostetler LLP and Hermitage Global Partners LP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Any and All Assets of Prevezon Soho USA, L.L.C. incl;uding but not limited to any and all funds on deposit in bank of america acct # 483016158084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Account 8949 JP Morgan Chase Bank in the name of Williams Brothers Inc in the amount of 753014.80 et al
as 3:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Account 8949 JP Morgan Chase Bank in the name of Williams Brothers Inc in the amount of 753014.80, Account 9549 PNC Bank in the name of Gregory and Linda Oldiges in the amount of 265962.50, Account 6919 PNC Bank in the name of Gregory and Linda Oldiges in the amount of 17679.30 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. IAG Capital Management, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00983
Defendant:
IAG Capital Management, LLC and William Patrick Kelly
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Williams' Personal Property et al
as 2:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Williams' Personal Property, A Taurus ,Model PT27/7, Eight (8) Rounds of Brailian Cartridge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
United States of America v. $40,173.25 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$40,173.25 in United States Currency and $40,000.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
William Dean Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. $6,400.00 in US Currency et al
as 5:2013cv00589
Defendant:
$6,400.00 in US Currency , Coins, Four Hundred Thirteen Silver, Eighteen 1 oz Silver Bars, and Eight 10 oz Silver Bars, $19,600.00 in US Currency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Todd William Hoss , Bruce Landen Middlebrook , Melissa Middlebrook and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
William Brock, et al v. Approximately $1,305,105 in As, et al
as 13-1452
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
WILLIAM BROCK
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $1,305,105 IN ASSORTED SILVER BARS AND GOLD AND SILVER COINS, FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, ONE 2010 FORD F-250 CREW CAB XL, VIN# 1FTSW2BR6AEA56205 and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 266 VEHICLES
as 1:2013cv00289
Claimant:
OSCAR AGUILAR NOLASCO, SUSANA CHAVEZ, JAMES DESPAIN and others
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY 266 VEHICLES and SHANE A. MCDONALD
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
United States v. Shannon William
as 13-1200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Shannon E. Williams
FREEMAN v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREEMAN
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
