Cases 31 - 40 of 56
USA v. $17,900.00
as 16-5284
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, c/o United States Attorney's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($17,900.00) In United States Currency
Claimant - Appellant:
Joyce Copeland and Angela Rodriquez
United States of America v. Approximately $91,246.57 from New Millenium Medical Imaging P.C., Investors Bank Acct. #...8926 et al
as 4:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $91,246.57 from New Millenium Medical Imaging P.C., Investors Bank Acct. #...8926, Approximately $4,098.60 from Best Quality X-Ray Inc., Investors Bank Acct. #...0289, Approximately $56,278.90 from SR Wellnes PT P.C., Northfield Bank Acct. #...0262 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A TOTAL OF $3,397,230.97 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 2:2015cv03952
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
A TOTAL OF $3,397,230.97 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY , $417,866.75 SEIZED FROM VALLEY NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 41651901, HELD IN THE NAME OF EXCELL BRANDS, $305,070.41 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER 381031654225, HELD IN THE NAME OF EXCELL BRANDS and others
Claimant:
LYNETTE ROSENBLUM, BERNARD ROSENBLUM, A. ROSENBLUM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $10,345.00
as 5:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $10,345.00 Seized From The Following Locations Within Friends Mart, Zebulon, North Carolina, $4,430.00 in the Blue Money Bag in Drawer in Office, $1,348.00 in a BB&T Money Bag with NCEL Markings in Drawer in the Office and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Pierce et al v. Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv02001
Plaintiff:
Michael S Pierce , Billie Jeanine Cameron , Tracy D Stradford and others
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Police Department , Scott Mielke, C. J. Frey and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
United States of America
3rd_party_plaintiff:
City of Brooklyn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
PELULLO v. U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2013cv04002
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE L. PELULLO
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, NEW JERSEY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Hewlett Packard Office Jet Printer et al
as 4:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Office Jet Printer, Sixty-Seven Pages of Resume Paper and Thirteen Pages of Counterfeit United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant:
475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at, AKA Seal A
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 13-55556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG and ERIC HONIG
Defendant:
475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
United States of America v. One Cashier's Check in the amount of $403,915.61 issued by Capital One Bank, Dated April 27, 2012, payable to The Bronx County District Attorney's Office, and all property tracaeble the
as 1:2012cv08449
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Cashier's Check in the amount of $403,915.61 issued by Capital One Bank, Dated April 27, 2012, payable to The Bronx County District Attorney's Office, and all property traceable the
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
