Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,362
United States of America v. $50,750 in U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2023cv03560
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $50,750 in U.S. Currency, $1,667 in U.S. Currency and $167,064.07 in U.S. Currency Seized From Ameris Bank Check Number 3160
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Approx. $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245 et al
as 2:2023mc00301
Plaintiff: United States and United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245, Approximately $38,582.49 seized from TD Ameritrade account number 756-362930, Approximately $3,061.65 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account number 6214166578 and others
United States of America v. Approximately $110,270.86 in Funds Derived from a Check Funded by Truist Bank Account XXXXXX9774 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $110,270.86 in Funds Derived from a Check Funded by Truist Bank Account XXXXXX9774
United States of America v. Real property located at 301 Golfcrest Drive, Dearborn, Michigan et al
as 2:2023cv11728
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real property located at 301 Golfcrest Drive, Dearborn, Michigan, 2016 BMW M4, VIN WBS3U9C52GP969127, Currency $122,034.33 in funds from Bank Account Number 0054-0087-2536 in the name of BFRX LLC, dba Better Care Neighborhood Pharmacy at Bank of America, Detroit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In Re: 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, $61,576.99 from Navy Federal Credit Union Account Number XXXXXX8007 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. $326,461.33 in U.S. Currency Seized From Douglas National Bank Account Ending in 6227
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $326,461.33 in U.S. Currency Seized From Douglas National Bank Account Ending in 6227
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $909,708.64 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUBLEDGER AT CITIBANK, N.A. PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7108, IN THE NAME OF NTGH 2A AUTO TRADE, INC, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $909,708.64 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUBLEDGER AT CITIBANK, N.A. PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 7108, IN THE NAME OF NTGH 2A AUTO TRADE, INC, LLC and $69,003.39 IN U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM A SUSPENSE ACCOUNT AT JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., PREVIOUSLY HELD IN ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0913, IN THE NAME OF SIGLO EXPORT IMPORT 22 CORP,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
United States of America v. Approximately $448,157.39 seized from Bank of America account number 325175831591
as 2:2023at00647
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $448,157.39 seized from Bank of America account number 325175831591
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Approx. $448,157.39 seized from B of A We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01328
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $448,157.39 seized from Bank of America account number 325175831591
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $537,000.00 More or less Seized From Bank of America account number XXXXXX4620 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: $537,000.00 More or less Seized From Bank of America account number XXXXXX4620
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?