Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Taurus 9mm, Ruger 9mm, Clips & Ammunition
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Taurus 9mm, Ruger 9mm, Clips & Ammunition
Interested Party: Kennedy Kiprotich
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture in Rem
United States of America v. $217,609.52 In Funds from Wells Fargo Account et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $217,609.52 in funds from Wells Fargo Account Ending 8961, $95,731.81 in funds from Wells Fargo Account ending 5813, $59,300 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant: John Patrick Lopez, Roger Corrales and Beverly Corrales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $66,920.00
as 1:2021cv00713
Interested Party: Tatianna Kennedy
Defendant: $66,920.00
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One (1) caiman leather handbag seized at the United States Postal Service International Mail Facility at John F. Kennedy International Airport on or about November 12, 2019
as 1:2020cv02526
Plaintiff: One (1) caiman leather handbag seized at the United States Postal Service International Mail Facility at John F. Kennedy International Airport on or about November 12, 2019 and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 1501 Rockwater Lane, North Little Rock, AR 72114 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00701
Defendant: Real Property and Residence Located at 5064 Copperglen Circle, Colleyville, TX 76034, Real Property Located at 1501 Rockwater Lane, North Little Rock, AR 72114, Real Property and Structure Located at 3600 John F Kennedy Blvd and 105 E F Avenue, North Little Rock, AR 72116 and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. $200,980 (US)
as 1:2019cv01561
Defendant: $200,980 (US) and $200,980 (US) currency
Plaintiff: USA and United States of America
Claimant: Lesli Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States Government v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-41077
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES AGGREY-KWEGGYIR ARUNGA, and all Other Allies of the United States of America, Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, 7+years Imperial Administrations and Expulsions Fuzes of President Barack Hussein Obama and Vice President "Joe" Biden, JOSEPH "JOE" BIDEN, 7+years Imperial Administrations and Expulsions Fuzes of President Barack Hussein Obama and Vice President Joseph "Joe" Biden, S. BREYER, Scoutus Dictum Expulsion Fainaiguing Fuzes and others
United States Government et al v. Obama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff: United States Government, Jus Hetero Generational-Propagational Posterity-Citizenships, Texas and 26-States of Union and others
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph "Joe" Biden, S. Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
United States of America v. Twenty-Two Types of Drugs in Various Quantities Seized from John D. Kennedy International Airport on May 10, 2010 et al
as 1:2015cv02604
Defendant: Eight Types of Cosmetics in Various Quantities Seized from John F. Kennedy International Airport on May 7, 2010, One Type of Drug or Cosmetic Labeled "Ichtyol Ointment" Seized from John F. Kennedy International Airport on May 7, 2010, Twenty-Two Types of Drugs in Various Quantities Seized from John D. Kennedy International Airport on May 10, 2010 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately Sixty Nine (69) Rough Diamonds Seized at John F. Kennedy International Airport on March 15, 2013
as 1:2014cv00538
Defendant: Approximately Sixty Nine (69) Rough Diamonds Seized at John F. Kennedy International Airport on March 15, 2013
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?