Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Stidom v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2021cv01389
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kendrick Demon Stidom and Kendrick Demon Stidom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
M. et al v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 4:2021cv00009
Defendant:
UnitedHealthCare Consumer Driven Health Plan and JP Morgan Chase
Plaintiff:
H. M. and John M.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RUSSO v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2020cv05287
Plaintiff:
VINCENT RUSSO, JR.
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hudson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 9:2020cv81494
Plaintiff:
J Steven Hudson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knopp v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2020cv01811
Plaintiff:
Aida Knopp
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Kaihlanen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 5:2019cv01199
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kaihlanen
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Porter v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00354
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Melissa Y. Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bouskos v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv01431
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bouskos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bouskos v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019at00727
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bouskos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Rourke v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2019cv00302
Trustee:
Kevin, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee for th O'Rourke
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., a Delaware corporation, Ashley Loyd, an individual, Ashley Loyd and others
Debtor:
Alma Briseida Avila
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Rourke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
