Cases 11 - 20 of 22
RILEY et al v. E&E CONSULTING LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06628
Plaintiff:
LINDA RILEY , LEE ANN RILEY , KARINDA PARKS and others
Defendant:
E&E CONSULTING LLC, EUGENE GOLDSHTEYN and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Teague et al v. Bowersox
as 3:2013cv03948
Plaintiff:
Ronald Teague , Jimmy Caddell and James Jones
Defendant:
Don Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jones v. United Auto Workers Local 551 et al
as 1:2012cv10151
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and United Auto Workers Local 551
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Davis et al v. County of Santa Clara
as 5:2012cv02559
Plaintiff:
Daryl Davis , Edward Galetti and James Jones
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AVNET et al v. ABBOTT SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KOS
as 3:2011cv07438
Plaintiff:
ROBERT AVNET , BRENDA BENNETT , GINA BIGLIONE and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KOS PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jones v. Bell et al
as 1:2010cv24282
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Bert Bell / Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones v. Estes Express Lines
as 2:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Bell et al
as 1:2010cv03220
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Bert Bell / Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hunter Levi v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, et al
as 08-3820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hunter R. Levi
Defendant - Appellee:
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., August Busch, Mark Bobak and others
Ebersole et al v. Edscha Jackson, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv12925
Plaintiff:
Mary Ebersole, Mary Ebersole, Mary Ebersole and others
Defendant:
Edscha Jackson, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
