Cases 11 - 20 of 3,317
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 22 v. Omaha Electric Service, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 22
Defendant:
Omaha Electric Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 727 v. Lincoln Security Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv04276
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 727
Defendant:
Lincoln Security Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Allied New York Services, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, Local 553
as 1:2024cv03713
Plaintiff:
Allied New York Services, Inc.
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, Local 553
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Carmon v. Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Patsy E. Carmon
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC, Daniel Tauriello, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 988 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Kraft Heinz Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 355
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 355
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 223 et al v. Coastal Electric, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11261
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 223, Trustees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 223 Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 223 Deferred Income Fund and others
Defendant:
Coastal Electric, Inc., Rise Construction Management Inc. and The Mourad Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
US Foods, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 87 et al
as 2:2024cv03949
Plaintiff:
US Foods, Inc. and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 87, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 542, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 630 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund et al v. Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp et al
as 5:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Annuity Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction and Randy E. Dearing Individually and as an Officer of Highliners Barbecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension Fund et al v. Sulphur Electric Co Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund, NECA-IBEW Family Medical Care Plan and others
Defendant:
Sulphur Electric Co Inc, West Cal Electric, LLC and Jeffrey Stark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10907
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC, Kevin Cox and Nathan McCardell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
