Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Baldwin v. CoreCivic Of Tennessee, LLC
as 2:2018cv02390
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Baldwin
Defendant:
CoreCivic Of Tennessee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Dew v. Corecivic, Inc.
as 8:2018cv01500
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dew
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dew v. Corecivic, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01500
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dew
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BARRIENTOS et al v. CORECIVIC INC
as 4:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
WILHEN HILL BARRIENTOS , MARGARITO VELAZQUEZ-GALICIA and SHOAIB AHMED
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bingham v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
as 4:2018cv00618
Plaintiff:
John Bingham
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Gonzalez et al v. CoreCivic, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02573
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzalez , Juan Jose Merino-Rodas , Maribel Gutierrez-Canchola and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01228
Plaintiff:
Terrell Green
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Tamara Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Nieto v. Corrections Corporation of America, et al
as 5:2017cv00339
Defendant:
CCA of Tennessee LLC, CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Nieto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jones and Patricia Reed
Defendant:
Correctional Medicine Associates, P.C. , CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Gonzalez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016at01030
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and CoreCivic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
