Cases 21 - 30 of 44
OOMMEN v. CINTAS CORPORATION
as 5:2015cv01984
Plaintiff:
THALESSERIL JOHN OOMMEN
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CAPERTON v. CINTAS CORPORATION WELFARE PLAN et al
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
TAMMY CAPERTON
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION WELFARE PLAN and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Byndloss v. Cintas Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06720
Plaintiff:
Andrew Byndloss
Defendant:
Cintas Corporate Services, Inc., Cintas Corporation No.2 and Ryan Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Castro v. Cintas Corporation No. 3
as 5:2013cv05330
Plaintiff:
Manuel Castro
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Cintas Corporation
as 2:2013cv01316
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michael Zeif v. Cintas Corporation No 2 et al
as 8:2013cv00413
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No 2 and Does
Plaintiff:
Michael Zeif
Chauffeurs Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No 414 v. Cintas Corporation
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Local Union No 414 Chauffeurs Teamsters and Helpers
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Collins v. Cintas Corporation
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Nichole Collins
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Arrighi v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 1:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Arrighi , Lawrence Cronin , Edward F. Flynn, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweesy v. Cintas Corporation No. 3 et al
as 3:2010cv00501
Plaintiff:
Curtis Sweesy
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 3 and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
