Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Gleaton et al v. Kens Stereo Video Junction Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Edward Jackson Gleaton and Justin Alan Mixon
Defendant:
Kens Stereo Video Junction Inc and Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JONES v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 1:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON and LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
John Michael Jones
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Group Life, Medical and LTD Plan No. 502
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Certified Environmental Services et al
as 3:2008cv00930
Plaintiff:
Harold Brown
Defendant:
Certified Environmental Services and Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2008cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roebuck v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation
as 1:2007cv01083
Plaintiff:
Kristen Roebuck, Jonaius Avery, Lakeshia Bell and others
Defendant:
Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roebuck et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 3:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kristin Roebuck, Kristin Roebuck, Jonaius Avery and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jones et al v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones, Charles Evans and Ronald B. Warren
Defendant:
Sanderson Farms, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
