Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2014cv01513
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
NADEAU v. LOCKHEED MARTIN SPECIALITY GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PLAN et al
as 2:2014cv03058
Plaintiff:
FRANCES A. NADEAU
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN SPECIALITY GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PLAN , LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION , LOCKHEED MARTIN SPECIALITY COMPONENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Popescu v. Metlife, Inc. et al
as 2:2013at00719
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Popescu
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Popescu v. Metlife, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Popescu
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SCHAEFFER v. METLIFE, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv03929
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
METLIFE, INC. , JEFFREY R. KURTZ and RONNIE S. BLAUFARB
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Gelfand v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 0:2013cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Gelfand
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , MetLife, Inc. , Citadel Broadcasting Company and others
Brandon Johnson v. Metlife Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Metlife Inc, Metlife Securities Inc and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Patricia Wyler-Wittenberg v. Metlife Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09036
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc. and Metlife Home Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Wyler-Wittenberg
Fahie v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 2:2012cv02636
Plaintiff:
Vanetia Fahie
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless and MetLife Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
