Cases 31 - 40 of 69
HEDGEPETH v. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
as 1:2017cv09341
Plaintiff:
ERIC HEDGEPETH
Defendant:
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
FRIES v. B&R MOLL, INC.
as 2:2017cv04238
Plaintiff:
JIM FRIES
Defendant:
B&R MOLL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bravo et al v. NR Fried Chicken, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05277
Plaintiff:
Nereo Bravo and Juan Carlos Santiago
Defendant:
NR Fried Chicken, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Blanco v. R.B Fast Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00563
Plaintiff:
Leonel Blanco
Defendant:
R.B Fast Food, Inc., Royal Fried Chicken Inc., Akbar Hussain and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fries v. Residential Home Health Care, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03727
Plaintiff:
Erin Fries
Defendant:
Residential Home Health Care, LLC and Residential Home Health Illinois, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. New York Fried Chicken, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05702
Plaintiff:
Dinah Adams and Mary Ameyaa
Defendant:
Abdul Mosaver and New York Fried Chicken, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sinclair et al v. 20-15 Atlantic Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv04021
Defendant:
20-15 Atlantic Corp., Autostar Automotive Warehouse, Daniel Fried and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Charles, James Damon and Leroy Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Wintzell's Oyster House
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Raven Williams and D'Andre Wilkerson
Defendant:
Wintzell's Oyster House, Robert W. Omainsky , Wintzells, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Badue v. Tem-Kil Co. Inc.d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken
as 9:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Shana Badue
Defendant:
Tem-Kil Co. Inc.d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. Bretano House LLC et al
as 3:2014cv04786
Defendant:
Bretano House LLC, Christopher Fries and Marilyn Fries
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
