Cases 51 - 60 of 212
Egger v. Piedmont Airlines, Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 3:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Howard Paul Egger
Defendant:
Eli Evans, Piedmont Airlines, Inc. and Marvin Mulder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyd et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
Christine Boyd, Marissa Gazcon, Bryson Brown and others
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kane v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 8:2019cv02698
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff:
Mark C Kane and Mark C. Kane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HERR v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv04294
Defendant:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, ELI LILLY BONUS PLAN, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE HERR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Avila v. Sovereign Services of Houston, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03785
Plaintiff:
Eli Avila
Defendant:
Harry Karr, Sovereign Services of Houston, Inc. and Ray Karr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Katsnelson v. Pillars Funding LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05413
Defendant:
Pillars Funding LLC, Kevin Mills, Saul Sherman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Katsnelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Fortney et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2019cv04209
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Fortney and Eli Triplett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LOUIS-BENJAMIN v. HELPING HAND NURSE, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04327
Defendant:
HELPING HAND NURSE, LLC, REMILEKUN MULIKAT ODE and KEHINDAY JODA
Plaintiff:
ELIE LOUIS-BENJAMIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ely v. Al Hendrickson Jr. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv61207
Defendant:
Al Hendrickson Jr. Enterprises, Inc. and Alfred E. Hendrickson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jackson Ely
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fish v. Ely's Tire, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv61068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fish
Defendant:
Elias Dammous and Ely's Tire, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
