Cases 51 - 60 of 778
Byther v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Connie Byther
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
ADAMS v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 0:2023cv60678
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN E ADAMS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. a Delaware corporation doing business as Sams Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gardy v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Sams Gardy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ed Removal - Employment Discrimination
Vargas v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 3:2023cv50108
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Monterosso v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Iris Monterosso
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Gibbs v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Richard Gibbs
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Gai v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Fatimatou Gai
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morrison v. Wal-Mart
as 4:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Catherine S. Morrison
Defendant:
Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hendrickson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Mark Hendrickson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
