Cases 61 - 70 of 388
Brooks v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 3:2019cv05054
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kala Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myra Huizar v. AT and T Mobility LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06020
Plaintiff:
Myra Huizar
Defendant:
DOES 1-25, inclusive,, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT and T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meacham v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00963
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Meacham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Devyn S. Reece v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03023
Defendant:
AT and T Mobility Services LLC and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Devyn S. Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Devyn S. Reece v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00733
Defendant:
AT and T Mobility Services LLC and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Devyn S. Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tuggle v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1-AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program
as 7:2019cv00311
Plaintiff:
Sandra Tuggle
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1-AT&T Mobility Disability Benefits Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Chetwood et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kristina Chetwood and Sandra Castellon-Gonzalez
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Washington v. T-Mobile Short Term Disability Plan
as 2:2018cv03501
Defendant:
T-Mobile Short Term Disability Plan
Plaintiff:
Valerie Washington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carter v. AT&T Mobility Services, L.L.C.
as 5:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Selisky v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2018cv00153
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Erika C. Selisky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
