Cases 71 - 80 of 298
Pierce v. Trav's Trucking, Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv00705
Defendant:
Trav's Trucking, Corp, Travis Everhardus, FedEx Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pierce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. Howard and Sons Automotive Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03289
Defendant:
Philip Howard and Howard and Sons Automotive Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Pierce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Pierce v. McNelly Optical Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01941
Plaintiff:
Ginger Pierce
Defendant:
McNelly Optical Co., Inc. and John A. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pierce v. McNelly Optical Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01941
Plaintiff:
Ginger Pierce
Defendant:
McNelly Optical Co., Inc. and John A. Marshall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Breeden v. Green Valley Partners, LLC. et al
as 1:2018cv01531
Plaintiff:
Amanda Breeden
Defendant:
Mike Pierce, Jr. and Green Valley Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. Apache Corporation
as 4:2018cv01803
Plaintiff:
Brian Pierce
Defendant:
Apache Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ricardo Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv05690
Plaintiff:
Steve Sainz, Martin Martinez, Lee Jensen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diedrich v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
as 2:2018cv00652
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Plaintiff:
Dawn Diedrich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Frederick, Kristi v. Pierce County
as 3:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Kristi Frederick
Defendant:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00756
Plaintiff:
Darnell Pierce
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
