Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mok v. Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Christian Mok
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Cao et al v. Joy Luck Palace, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00925
Defendant:
Patrick Mok, Tak M Yee, Qing Wen Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Chong Lee, Yan Hua Liu, Pei Yun Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mok v. BK Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Kristin Mok
Defendant:
BK Holdings LLC and Brian Cung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Apple Nail Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00802
Plaintiff:
Nijuana Jones
Defendant:
Apple Nail Corporation, Sang Mok, Geein Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mok v. 21 Mott St. Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv08081
Plaintiff:
William Mok
Defendant:
21 Mott St. Restaurant Corp. , Peter Lee and Philip Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mok v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00704
Plaintiff:
Charles Mok
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mok v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2013cv02022
Plaintiff:
Charles Mok
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chen et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2012cv05212
Plaintiff:
Lucio Aguirre, Jing Yi Chen, Jose Diaz and others
Defendant:
Wing Yu Lee and Sunrise Victory Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIM v. NJ HANNAM CHAIN, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01353
Plaintiff:
HYUNG TAE KIM
Defendant:
NJ HANNAM CHAIN, INC., GENE JINSOO KIM, SAE MOK LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Melara et al v. Gil Mok Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv11509
Plaintiff:
Florencio Melara and Rene A. Ventura
Defendant:
Gil Mok Corporation and Young Sook Park
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
