Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Awadallah et al v. Safelite Fulfillment
as 1:2023cv10110
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Awadallah and Jeffrey Sousa
Defendant:
Safelite Fulfillment doing business as Safelite AutoGlass
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jose Soto v. Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv02092
Plaintiff:
Jose Soto
Defendant:
Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES INC., DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rollins v. Safelite Solutions, LLC
as 2:2021cv05805
Plaintiff:
Dreidre Rollins
Defendant:
Safelite Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Edmond Alvarez et al v. Safelite Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07874
Plaintiff:
Edmond Alvarez and Thomas Newell
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc., Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sheumaker v. Safelite Solutions LLC
as 2:2020cv06562
Plaintiff:
Jessica Sheumaker
Defendant:
Safelite Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Elliott v. Safelite Group, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01398
Plaintiff:
Toby Elliott
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marrero v. Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ivan Marrero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Young v. Safelite Fulfillment Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01027
Defendant:
Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Fulfillment Inc and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Mario E. Young, Jr. and Mario E Young, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Safelite Group, Inc. v. Borkowski et al
as 2:2018cv01164
Defendant:
Reema Flores and Lisa Borkowski
Plaintiff:
Safelite Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Holcomb v. Safelite Group, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Clarence Holcomb
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
