Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Wynn MA, LLC v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25 et al
as 1:2024cv10067
Plaintiff:
Wynn MA, LLC
Defendant:
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25 and UNITE HERE!, Local 26
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Wynn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06044
Plaintiff:
Brittany Wynn
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Little v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
as 2:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Sheila Little
Defendant:
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
WYNN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
JESSALYNN WYNN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
POFF v. WYNNE BUILDING CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv14162
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS POFF
Defendant:
WYNNE BUILDING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Wynn MA, LLC v. Unite Here!, Local 26
as 1:2023cv11223
Plaintiff:
Wynn MA, LLC
Defendant:
UNITE HERE!, Local 26
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Wynn v. Staffmark Investment, LLC
as 3:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Wynn
Defendant:
Staffmark Investment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lansford v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Alexa Lansford
Defendant:
Luke Cantrell and Wynne, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
