Cases 31 - 40 of 6,300
Sears v. Humana Inc.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Adam Sears
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Waker v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02613
Plaintiff:
Samantha Waker
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rodriguez et al v. Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04562
Defendant:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Performance Food Group, Inc., Kenneth O. Lester Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Rodriguez and Daisy Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stock et al v. Tiffin Motors Homes, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02451
Defendant:
Tiffin Motors Homes, Inc. and Lazydays of Minneapolis, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gerry Stock and Warren Stock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Reveron v. Spreadshirt, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04093
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Management Corporation, Walmart-Stores, Inc., PlanetArt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M. Reveron
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv03085
Defendant:
Leavenworth U.S. Penitentiary, (fnu) McMillen, (fnu) Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Garland
as 24-9545
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Sears v. Long, et al
as 24-1256
Respondent:
RYAN LONG, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner:
CRISTINA W. SEARS
Dilley et al v. Sears
as 6:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Dilley and Linda Dilley
Defendant:
Sears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
