Cases 61 - 70 of 6,260
Ball v. Citibank
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
William H Ball
Defendant:
Citibank a New York Corporation doing business as Sears Shop Your Way
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlton Mathews v. J. W. Walters, et al
as 24-10207
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
CHAD LESSER, T BARKER, KEVIN RODRIGUEZ and others
Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma v. City of Wagoner, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rural Water District No. 6 Wagoner County, Oklahoma
Defendant:
City of Wagoner, Oklahoma, Wagoner Public Works Authority and Wagoner, City of
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1926 Water and Waste Facility Loans and Grants
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zhongtie Dacheng (Zhuhai) Investment Management Co Ltd v. Yan, et al.
as 24-736
Petitioner:
ZHONGTIE DACHENG (ZHUHAI) INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO LTD
Respondent:
JINGGANG YAN and LIANG XIUHONG
Heppolette v. DFJ Vinhos, S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv05844
Plaintiff:
Laura M. Heppolette
Defendant:
DFJ Vinhos, S.A. and Jessica Haulter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
DURHAM v. GANGI et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
ANTHONY GANGI, S. LEWIS, L. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaurin v. O'Neal et al
as 6:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sam McLaurin
Defendant:
Chaplain O'Neal, Regan Page, D. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Thor Motor Coach
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Franklin
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stewart v. Walls. et al
as 8:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Deon A. Stewart
Defendant:
Walls., Taget Boyd, Cathy Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
