Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 155,954
Gardner v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40067
Petitioner: Robert Gardner
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DS Advanced Enterprises v. LEDVANCE LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11155
Plaintiff: DS Advanced Enterprises
Defendant: LEDVANCE LLC and Lowes Global Sourcing Shanghai Trading Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DAS v. IROBOT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv11158
Plaintiff: DYLAN DAS
Defendant: iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and JULIE ZEILER
Keller North America, Inc. v. D'Ambra Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff: Keller North America, Inc. and Hayward Baker, Inc.
Defendant: D'Ambra Construction Co., Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brum v. Town of Bristol et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Michael Brum
Defendant: Town of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: LARRY DAVIS
Defendant: BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GAMBINO v. BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: TONYA GAMBINO
Defendant: BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10544
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
US v. Trinidad-Jorge
as 24-1408
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOSE RAUL TRINIDAD-JORGE, a/k/a Trini
Rivera Samayoa v. Garland
as 24-1432
Petitioner: MIGUEL ARMANDO RIVERA SAMAYOA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?