Cases 91 - 100 of 218
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER CASE)
as 1:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Brazier and Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. Hudson et al
as 6:2021cv01058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Aaron and Heath Aaron
Defendant:
Blake Carter Hudson and Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson, Sergeant Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Mason et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Charlie Health Mason, Toni Scott Mason, Charlie Heath Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitt v. Moore et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Commander Moore, Officer Roberts, Sgt. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Consolidated Defendant:
James Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Morris (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Commander Moore, Officer Roberts and Sgt. Morris
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 1:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Commander Moore, James Brazier and Kelita Moore
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath et al v. White Glove Delivery of Georgia Inc et al
as 7:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry Heath and Julius Russell, Jr
Defendant:
White Glove Delivery of Georgia Inc and Phillip Oties Pack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
