Cases 91 - 100 of 145
ARZOLA-BERRIOS v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv04204
Petitioner:
MISAEL ARZOLA-BERRIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Southern Nevada Confederation of Clubs et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01093
Defendant:
J Adkisson, Joseph Chronister, Joseph Gagliardi and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Aguilar, Jose Angel Aguilar, Alex Arzola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARZOLA V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv03888
Petitioner:
ARSENIO ARZOLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Antonio Salazar-Arzola v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71362
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SALAZAR-ARZOLA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
ARZOLA-BERRIOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02173
Petitioner:
MISAEL ARZOLA-BERRIOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Ibarra, et al v. ORICA USA, INC., et al
as 11-51094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE IBARRA, CARLOS SEGURA, SERGIO ANTONIO ALONZAO SEGURA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ORICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC, EXPLOSIVOS MEXICANOS S.A. DE C.V. and ALBERTO FUENTES, Individually
Arzola et al v. Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
William Arzola and Danalis B. Arzola
Defendant:
Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation, Countrywide Bank/Bank of America, Trustee Services of Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Nathan Arzola-Espinoza
as 11-50572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHAN ARZOLA-ESPINOZA, also known as Nathan Espinoza Arzola
Arzola-Martinez v. USA
as 3:2011cv01354
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Arzola-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arzola v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv30057
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Oscar Arzola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
