Cases 91 - 100 of 239
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Santa Clara Superior Court et al
as 2:2016cv09613
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Emergency Personal, Sgt. Kesloe, San Jose Police Department and others
Vianez v. Denver Court of Appeal et al
as 1:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
Juan Vianez
Defendant:
Denver Court of Appeal, District Court for Denver, Hinkinlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv02135
Plaintiff:
SHAUNDELLE DONTIA DIAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., GENERAL COUNSEL OF B.O.P., OIG OF B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv02740
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Lisa Ownby, Any and all Supervisors in the Board of parole and T.D.O.C. in Collusion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Blackman et al
as 3:2016cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson
Defendant:
B.E. Blackman, C. Curry, Director of B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. United States A.A. Office et al
as 4:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
United States A.A. Office, B.I.A. Corrections Personnel, U.S. B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. United States A.A. Office et al
as 9:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
United States A.A. Office, B.I.A. Corrections Personnel, U.S. B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. United States A.A. Office et al
as 6:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
United States A.A. Office, B.I.A. Corrections Personnel, U.S. B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryman v. Mullen et al
as 1:2016cv00047
Defendant:
Mullen, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Berryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Harding et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Johnson
Defendant:
Marcedes Harding, Derrick Schofield, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
