Cases 91 - 100 of 36,510
SEENARRAINE v. COLVIN
as 2:2017cv02734
Plaintiff:
BIBI ZALINA SEENARRAINE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RENDOS v. SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv00803
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN RENDOS, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHORT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2017cv02567
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bates v. Colvin
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv03311
Plaintiff:
Deasia Bates
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Colvin
as 3:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrison v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv01935
Plaintiff:
Nico Jermaine Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCCORMICK v. COLVIN
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv00483
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DONNELL MCCORMICK
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
HERMAN v. COLVIN
as 5:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL HERMAN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Bradshaw v. Carolyn Colvin
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BRADSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.