Cases 91 - 100 of 147
Shallcross v. Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv01266
Plaintiff:
Scott R Shallcross
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson, Edward Flynn, Donald Ours and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Idriss et al v. Ridgeway Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Idriss and Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Ridgeway Corporation and William Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jackson v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
as 1:2015cv06375
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson, Esq.
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lafayette Dental Office, P.C. v. Doss et al
as 1:2015cv01584
Defendant:
Shawna Doss and Christopher Jackson
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Friedman and Lafayette Dental Office, P.C.
Counter_claimant:
Christopher Jackson and Shawna Doss
Counter_defendant:
Mitchell Friedman and Lafayette Dental Office, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Everett et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv02539
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Luis A. Jimenez, Kathleen M. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Sir Demetrius Everett and Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Christopher Jackson
as 14-15637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JACKSON
Jackson v. Romanowski
as 2:2014cv14291
Petitioner:
Christopher Jackson
Respondent:
Kenneth Romanowski
State of Louisiana v. Jackson et al
as 3:2014cv00687
Defendant:
Ira Christopher Jackson and One Hundred Sixty-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and no/cents ($162,750.00) in U.S. Currency Mixed Denominations
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Christopher Jackson
as 14-10441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JACKSON
Jackson v. Maes et al
as 3:2014cv03167
Plaintiff:
Ira Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Maes, Leo Bondad and Paul Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
