Cases 91 - 100 of 105
Davis et al v. Connecticut Community Bank
as 3:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Davis, Wendy Sager Pomerantz, Arnold Kohn and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Community Bank NA and All Plaintiffs
Interested Party:
David S Golub
Petitioner:
Giuseppe C Basili
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv00576
Petitioner:
Daniel Horace Davis
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACKBOARD INC., v. ZIMMERS et al
as 1:2009cv01573
Plaintiff:
BLACKBOARD INC.,
Defendant:
STEVEN L. ZIMMERS and DANIEL W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Zimmers et al v. Blackboard Inc. et al
as 1:2009mc00048
Petitioner:
Steven L. Zimmers, Steven L. Zimmers, Daniel W. Davis and others
Respondent:
Blackboard Inc. and TechRadium, Inc.
Davis v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01504
Petitioner:
Daniel Horace Davis
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00518
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Megill, Wayne Chowinski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Grijalva et al
as 2:2009cv03148
Plaintiff:
Wanda Johnson, Wanda Johnson, Daniel M. Davis and others
Defendant:
Nemorio Martinez Grijalva, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. Daniel Davi
as 09-30059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL M. DAVIS
Davis v. Martel
as 1:2009cv00042
Petitioner:
Daniel Andrew Davis
Respondent:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2008ct03130
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Davis
Defendant:
United States Of America, Chatman, Dee and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
