Cases 91 - 100 of 142
Parvin v. Campbell et al
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jeremy David Parvin
Defendant:
David Campbell, City of Chattanooga, Tennessee and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colorado Outfitters Association et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
John B. Cooke , Terry Maketa , Justin Smith and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Montanez v. Joe Faulkner, et al
as 5:2013cv00401
Defendant:
David Campbell, Hays County, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montanez v. Hays County et al
as 1:2013cv00374
Defendant:
David Campbell, Joe Faulkner, Hays County and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montanez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robles-Pantoja v. Campbell et al
as 5:2013cv03025
Plaintiff:
Javier Robles-Pantoja
Defendant:
David Campbell, Srinivasa Rao G Vasa, W E Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Life Insurance Company of North America v. Campbell et al
as 6:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Iris S. Campbell, Jason Campbell, Zachary Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CAMPBELL v. HEASLEY et al
as 1:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
DAVID CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WILLIAM T. HEASLEY and KATAVITCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
