Cases 91 - 100 of 172
Turcotte v. CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE, et al
as 16-2461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINA TURCOTTE
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTA, ME, WILLIAM R. STOKES, in his individual and official capacities as Chief Deputy Attorney General for State of Maine, as Mayor for City of Augusta and as a government agent for State of Maine Judicial Branch, WILLIAM BRIDGEO, in his individual and official capacities as Manager for City of Augusta, and as a government agent for State of Maine Judicial Branch and others
Turcotte v. CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE, et al
as 16-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINA TURCOTTE
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTA, ME, WILLIAM R. STOKES, in his individual and official capacities as Chief Deputy Attorney General for State of Maine, as Mayor for City of Augusta and as a government agent for State of Maine Judicial Branch, WILLIAM BRIDGEO, in his individual and official capacities as Manager for City of Augusta, and as a government agent for State of Maine Judicial Branch and others
Wilhelmina Washington v. Alan Wilson
as 16-7634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILHELMINA WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, in his individual capacity as the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, WAYNE ALLEN MYRICK, JR., in his individual capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General, MEGAN WINES BURCHSTEAD, in her individual capacity as Assistant Attorney General and others
Defendant:
JOHN E FOLLIN, III, in his individual capacity as Special Agent with the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
Johnny Andoe v. Kevin Kemph, et al
as 16-35861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. ANDOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN KEMPH, Director, KEITH YORDY, Warden, MARK OLSON, Deputy Attorney General and others
Marquis West v. Attorney General, State of Geo, et al
as 16-16435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARQUIS B. WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, THURBERT E. BAKER, State Attorney General (Retired), DEVON ORLAND, Senior Assistant Attorney General and others
Sye Newton v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 16-3298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYE C. NEWTON
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Municipal Government, ANDREW J. WITHERELL, Attorney, RAYMOND M. RADULSKI, Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
IPEK KURUL, Deputy Attorney for Attorney General-State of Delaware, BRIAN ROBERTSON, Deputy Attorney General-State of Delaware, DIANE C. STREET, Superior Court Judge-State of Delaware and others
George Cleveland, III v. Judge Daniel Hall
as 16-6838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE DANIEL D. HALL, in his official capacity as Circuit Court Judge of South Carolina and KAREN C. RATIGAN, in her official capacity as Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina
Steven Thomason v. State of Alabama Home Builders, et al
as 16-14001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN THOMASON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA HOME BUILDERS LICENSURE BOARD, J. R. CARDEN, in his official capacity as Executive Director for the State of Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board, a.k.a. Chip Carden, KATHY PERRY BRASFIELD, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney General for the State of Alabama Home Builders LIcensure Board and others
Chris Jaye v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 16-2641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IONE K. CURVA, in her Official Capacity, THE HON. PETER A. BUCHSBAUM, individually and in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Law Division of Hunterdon County and others
James Lundeen, Sr. v. Nicholas Rhoad, et al
as 16-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS RHOAD, Director of the Indiana Professional Licensing Agnecy, STEPHEN L. HUDDLESTON, President, Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, AMBER SWARTZELL, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Indiana and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
