Cases 91 - 100 of 909
Ronald Lewis v. Harley Lappin
as 11-7450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Alexander Gessa v. Eric Holder, et al
as 11-11015
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEXANDER RAYMOND GESSA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director Bureau of Prisons and KEITH HALL, Warden
Raymond Clifton v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-30994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE CLIFTON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, GERALDO MALDONDO, JOE KEFFER and others
Ronald Plummer v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-30972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RAY PLUMMER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, GERALDO MALDONDO, JOE KEFFER and others
Still v. Herndon, et al
as 11-1463
Petitioner - Appellant:
MINOR MICHAEL STILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY HERNDON, Administrative Service, U.S. Marshall, Colorado, KEN DEAL, Deputy United States Marshal, Colorado and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01782
Plaintiff:
SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRESTLE v. LAPPIN
as 1:2011cv01771
Plaintiff:
GARY CHARLES BRESTLE
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COLEMAN v MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Defendant:
DEBBIE BURTON, DEBBIE BURTON, ROBERT ERWIN and others
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011ct03177
Plaintiff:
Marc Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy Johns, Karen Steinour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Allred
as 11-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, Mr. Clinical Director ADX
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, BOP, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP N.O. Region and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
