Cases 91 - 100 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
as 2:2011cv02964
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
James C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
as 1:2011at00697
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
James C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
ADAMS V. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv42205
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ADAMS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ADAMS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv36453
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. ADAMS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Roach v. Cowin et al
as 9:2011cv00660
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Roach
Defendant:
Timothy H. Cowin, K. VornDran, Rosemary Auber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Croteau v. The Trustee to the Chief Administrator of the Municipal Court et al
as 2:2011cv00296
Defendant:
The Trustee to the Chief Administrator of the Municipal Court, Elisabeth Adams, Jay B Rosmans and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Francis Croteau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. James Adam
as 11-1418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS, a/k/a James Leion Adams, a/k/a Speed Adams, a/k/a She Adams, a/k/a Terrence Unt, a/k/a Ancil Barnett, a/k/a Ansel Barnett, a/k/a Edward Hanp, a/k/a John Cullen Lewis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
