Cases 91 - 100 of 192
National Casualty Company v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2016cv00576
Defendant:
Michael Mitchell , Joyce Mitchell , Margie Dolin Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
National Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
American Mining Insurance Company v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2015cv16289
Plaintiff:
American Mining Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Mitchell, Joyce Mitchell, Margie Dolin Trucking Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Lilley et al
as 1:2015cv05935
Respondent:
T. Griffin and L. Lilley
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06657
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-5 and P.O. Michael Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Eon Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mitchell v. USA
as 1:2015cv01004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Timothy Mitchell v. USA
as 15-35669
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APONTE v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv05848
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA S. APONTE
Defendant:
RICHARD DRUMHELLAR, THOMAS MCCLOY, MICHAEL MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Riverside Pub & Grille, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03081
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Riverside Pub & Grille, Inc. and Michael W. Dicarlo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01983
Plaintiff:
Teressa Mitchell and Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyons et al v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv03139
Plaintiff:
Gary W Lyons and Elaine Griffing Pate
Defendant:
Glen R Harrington, Michael Mitchell, City of Litchfield, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
