Cases 91 - 100 of 106
Davis v. Shaw et al
as 2:2008cv02161
Plaintiff:
Bryan Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
David R Shaw, D. Jackson, S L Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHAW et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv87863
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. SHAW, NORMAN R. SHAW, PHYLLIS SHAW and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stoops #483451 v. Shaw et al
as 2:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
James Stoops #483451
Defendant:
R. Shaw, E. Warner and J. Andrzejak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02187
Plaintiff:
Benny R Shaw
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Champaign County States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Hense et al
as 1:2008cv00917
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Lydia C. Hense, J. Lopez, R. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Company Inc v. Petrohawk Properties L P
as 5:2008cv00845
Defendant:
Petrohawk Properties L P and Stuart R Shaw
Plaintiff:
Howard Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaw v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Shaw
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, DeSoto Correctional Institution, Florida Department of Children and Families and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Shaw
Defendant:
Florida Department of Children and Family Services, GEO Group Inc., Timothy J. Budz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John-Charles v. Abanico et al
as 3:2007cv05786
Plaintiff:
Curtis M. John-Charles
Defendant:
E. Abanico, L. Rayasa, Ben Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
