Cases 91 - 100 of 134,063
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Rosa-Tejeda v. Flemming
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel De La Rosa-Tejeda
Defendant:
CO Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Merlin Williams v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 24-6386
Plaintiff:
MERLIN LKENT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LIMITED, GOOGLE LLC and others
Parker v. Boyd et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Donald Parker
Defendant:
Nurse C. Boyd, Mr. R. Meneses and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
CUPO v. CUPO et al
as 2:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK P. CUPO, Jr.
Defendant:
LAURA E. CUPO, MARIE MARQUARDT, DETECTIVE MICHAEL L. RICE, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
