Cases 101 - 110 of 920
US v. Justus Allred
as 22-6443
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTUS ALLRED
US v. Justus Allred
as 22-6442
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTUS ALLRED
Carr v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Eddie Brian Carr
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services, AMS Vending Machines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jiovanni Jamel Alvarez Butler
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services and Ams Vending Machines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Manuel Moreno, Jr.
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services and AMS Vending Machines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services, Graham, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervain et al v. Hughs et al
as 4:2022mc00612
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mary Rogers v. Donna Allred, et al
as 22-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY A. NELSON ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA ALLRED, Sacramento County Clerk Recorder, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
