Cases 101 - 110 of 166
CALDWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv01438
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOHN ROBERTS, ELANA KAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLTON et al v. WERFEL
as 2:2013cv05236
Plaintiff:
ANNA E. CHARLTON and GARY L. FRANCIONE
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jones v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv02321
Plaintiff:
Ted Robert Jones
Defendant:
Sandra K. Miller, Sandra (I) K. Miller, Meagan Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-21076
Plaintiff:
Daniel I Dixon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Dixon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21076
Plaintiff:
Daniel I Dixon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of S. Jayne Esgar v. USA et al
as 1:2013cv02254
Petitioner:
Estate of S. Jayne Esgar
Respondent:
USA, Daniel I. Werfel and Casinova O. Henderson
Interested_party:
Legacy Bank
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Matthew v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv03088
Petitioner:
Renda S Matthew
Respondent:
United States of America, Daniel I Werfel and L'Detra V Norris
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Abel et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00780
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Abel , Sherian Ackley , Robbie Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Abel et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Abel , Sherian Ackley , Robbie Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Daniel Medford et al Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 0:2013cv01726
Plaintiff:
The QC Group Inc. , Daniel Medford and David DeVowe
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Seth D. Harris , Jacob Lew and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
