Cases 101 - 110 of 3,627
US v. Montello Hood
as 24-4054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MONTELLO MARQUETTE HOOD
Brown v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brown
Defendant:
Caleb Hudgins, Steven White, William Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kim Butler, Jeffery Coffey, Erskine Aldridge and others
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
HOOLI v. FLORIDA/ADVENTIST HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
BASAVARAJ HOOLI
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA/ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, KAREN HOOD, STATE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
John Kister v. Maria Wynn, et al
as 24-10192
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREW KISTER
Defendant:
MARIA WYNN, TAHIR SIDDIQ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Nimmons v. Fort Hood Army Base
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Juan M Nimmons
Defendant:
Fort Hood Army Base
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Hood v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv03008
Petitioner:
Richard Hood
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nimmons v. Fort Hood Army Base
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Juan M Nimmons
Defendant:
Fort Hood Army Case and Fort Hood Army Base
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wood v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Deanna Williamson, Freda Adu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
