Cases 101 - 110 of 162
MEDRANO v. I.L. CREATION OF MARYLAND, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ELADIO MEDRANO
Defendant:
I.L. CREATION OF MARYLAND, INC. and JAMES PARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rivera v. Clark et al
as 2:2015cv00143
Petitioner:
Kevin P. Rivera
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark, Tracy Ray, James Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrell Parks v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 15-1647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hung Sik You v. Win Soon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00615
Defendant:
Does, Dong Hwa Jeong, James Park and others
Plaintiff:
Hung Sik You
Jacori Carter v. James Park
as 15-6093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACORI ANDRE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Director of Offender Management Services
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, WARDEN DAVIS, JOYCETINE BOONE, Assistant Warden and others
Chauncey Williams v. James E. Park
as 14-7855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Manager Offender SRV., M. VARGO, Warden; Sussex II and JORDAN, Mental Health; Senior
Doucette et al v. Directv, Inc. et al
as TNW/2:14-cv-02800
Plaintiff:
John Doucette, III , Farrell Flowers , James Maddox and others
Defendant:
Directv, Inc. , DirecTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Darrell Parks v. K. Struab, et al
as 14-6274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. STRUAB, Correctional Counselor/Acting Lieutenant, JOHN DOE, Sued as "Unknown Lieutenant", MOULTON, Unit Manager and others
Doucette et al v. Directv, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02800
Plaintiff:
John Doucette, III , Farrell Flowers , James Maddox and others
Defendant:
Directv, Inc., DirecTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
