Cases 101 - 110 of 513
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82410
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONATHAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. CBD American Shaman, LLC
as 0:2020cv60897
Plaintiff:
Michael S Davis
Defendant:
CBD American Shaman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
DAVIS v. FLOYD CO JAIL et al
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
FLOYD CO JAIL, DR. GARCIA and ARCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Floyd Co Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Floyd Co Jail, Co Archer and Nurse Garcia
Plaintiff:
Michael C Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65937
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 7:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH DAVIS, SR
Defendant:
BETH C GREENE, LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL, WADE KRUEGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Bell v. Michael Davis, et al
as 20-35065
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, an individual, AKA James Michael Davis, BIGADO NETWORKS INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation, MJ CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., an Oregon corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BELL, an individual
Davis v. Alameda County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2020cv00542
Defendant:
Loval, M. Carausu, Lt. Carrie Carone and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Arthur Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Logansport State Hospital et al
as 2:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Chad Davis, Ashley S Armstrong, Margie and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
