Cases 101 - 110 of 15,014
Cabrera-Velasquez v. Garland
as 24-1226
Petitioner:
EMERSON GERARDO CABRERA-VELASQUEZ and KENY SALOME VELASQUEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villalta Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1222
Petitioner:
JOSE SAUL VILLALTA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Parvin v. Garland
as 24-1228
Petitioner:
TANJIM PARVIN, TAHSINUL ISLAM, TASHNIMUL ISLAM and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosales Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1215
Petitioner:
MARLON ORLANDO ROSALES LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams et al v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antoine-Denard Williams, Sr. and Virginia Loretta Baker
Defendant:
State of Florida, Joseph Biden, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bannikov v. Garland
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
PAVEL BANNIKOV, NIKOLAI BANNIKOV, LIUBOV BANNIKOVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sava v. Garland
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
PAMELA SAVA, SALAJAN SAVA and DAVID SAVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
