Cases 101 - 110 of 1,183,395
Early v. Callejas et al
as 2:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Olajuwan Early
Defendant:
Abigail Callejas, Jerome Warfield, Ricardo Moore and others
Moorlet #409220 v. Corrigan
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Terrence Moorlet #409220
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McVey v. Attorney General of the State of Montana
as 9:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Michael Nathan Shae McVey
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaparro v. Childers et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Chaparro
Defendant:
Childers, Ferro, Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgarito v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Brandon Delgarito
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skountzos
as 1:2024cv03317
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Skountzos
Other:
FCI Otisville, Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lidge v. USA
as 5:2024cv00769
Petitioner:
Kevin R. Lidge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
