Cases 111 - 120 of 424
Animashaun v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2019cv03257
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Dective Morgan, State Attorney for Baltimore County, Lisa Dever Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Martin v. Carroll County Sherriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv03265
Defendant:
Sheriff T. DeWees James, Jane Doe, et al and Carroll County Sherriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farmer v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2019cv03172
Plaintiff:
Dee Deidre Farmer
Defendant:
Duke Regional Hospital and Jane Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. Bombardier Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03044
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc., Bombardier Inc., BOMBARDIER TRANSIT CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv02927
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr.
Defendant:
The Board of Commissioners Jeff Cline, Heidi Foster, Heidi R Oxx-Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Malone et al v. Wicomico County Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv02412
Defendant:
Brittany Stevenson, Wicomico County Maryland, Conmed, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gosier Daniel and Donna Lynn Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Fashion Exchange (Shanghai) Culture Company, Ltd.
as 1:2019cv02366
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Fashion Exchange (Shanghai) Culture Company, Ltd.
Jane Doe #2 v. Charles County Board of Education et al
as 8:2019cv02050
Defendant:
Kenneth Schroeck, Board of Education of Charles County, Carlos D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe/John Doe #2 and Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
