Cases 111 - 120 of 400
Stafford v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01054
Defendant:
Scott D Farmer, J Michael Hansen, Cintas Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Stafford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Perine et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00896
Plaintiff:
Susan Perine and Charles Walter Perine
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation and United Airlines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation, et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
as 5:2019cv01246
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2019cv00881
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
D'Alessandro et al v. Cintas Corp. No. 2
as 2:2019cv00686
Plaintiff:
Rocky D'Allesandro and Angela D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perine et al v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2019cv05427
Plaintiff:
Susan Perine and Charles Walter Perine
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2, Cintas Corporation and United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation v. Vapor Oilfield Services LLC
as 1:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Vapor Oilfield Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Young, Jr. v. Cintas Corporation Number Two
as 19-10757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT YOUNG, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CINTAS CORPORATION NUMBER TWO
Maktari v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 2:2019cv11998
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amani Maktari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
