Cases 111 - 120 of 866
Gamboa v. Atlas Spine Specialties, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Frank Gerard Gamboa, Jr.
Defendant:
Atlas Spine Specialties, LLC and Edmundo T. (Ed) Cota
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Carranza et al
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones
Defendant:
Georege Carranza, Daniels, Ziese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Phyllis S. Sanford
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Marisa Gamboa, ABC Corps #1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Gamboa
as 3:2022cv05823
Petitioner:
Andrew Jones
Respondent:
Warden Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez Gamboa v. Garland
as 22-163
Petitioner:
FRANCISCA RODRIGUEZ GAMBOA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
John Harold Ives v. M. Gamboa
as 2:2022cv06859
Petitioner:
John Harold Ives
Respondent:
M. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAMBOA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. GAMBOA, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
R.V. Coleman v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv05977
Plaintiff:
R. V. Coleman
Defendant:
R. C. Johnson, J. Knight, M. Fordham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Cross et al
as 2:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Ada R. Cross, Counselor Contreas, P. Sahota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
